DUI & Criminal Division
(800) 625-5232

RECENT COURT VICTORIES

To protect our clients privacy, incomplete case numbers are provided.

Case Summary

Date: 01/12/2004
Case #: 02-153XXMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
An officer responded to the defendants vehicle on the turnpike in response to a concerned citizen. Upon making contact the defendant appeared to be very impaired on a controlled substance. The defendant was arrested and refused to give urine sample. DUI charge was dropped.

Case Summary

Date: 12/15/2003
Case #: 99-156XX MM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
The defendant was stopped for running a red light. Once stopped he was investigated for DUI. He performed roadside exercises and was arrested for DUI. Once arrested for DUI he blew .177 and .180. DUI charge dropped.

Case Summary

Date: 11/12/2003
Case #: 03-200XXMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
The defendant was stopped for reckless driving. A DUI investigation let to his arrest . He blew .050 and .047, and he took a urine test which showed marijuana. DUI charge dropped.

Case Summary

Date: 11/06/2003
Case #: 03-0149XXMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
A security guard contacted police informing them that the defendant , who was leaving his station was possibly impaired. Police responded, observing poor driving and investigated her for DUI. The office believed that she was impaired by narcotics. The defendant performed the roadside exercises poorly, and refused a urine test. DUI charge dropped.

Case Summary

Date: 11/05/2003
Case #: 200X-XT-1XXX4-0 NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
The Defendant was initially stopped for weaving out of their lane within a quarter mile. Defendant appeared to hit the curb twice with the right front tire. After making contact the Officer noticed a strong smell of alcoholic beverages and red bloodshot eyes. The Officer requested the Defendant perform field sobriety exercises and concluded the Defendant was impaired based upon his performance. The Defendant was taken to the Police Station where he had a blood alcohol level of .066 and admitted to taking medication that caused him to be drowsy and almost pass out. State Attorney dismissed case on day of trial, January 23rd 2006.

Case Summary

Date: 10/28/2003
Case #: 03-4XXMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
The defendant was stopped for speeding. Once arrested for DUI she took the breath test and blew .137 and .146. Acquitted by jury

Case Summary

Date: 10/15/2003
Case #: 03-52XXMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
The defendant was driving his vehicle on I-95 at approx 82 mph in a 65 mph zone. Once stopped he was investigated for DUI. After the roadside exercises were completed he was arrested for DUI. He refused breath testing. DUI charge dropped.

Case Summary

Date: 09/26/2003
Case #: 03-0200XXMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
The defendant was observed rolling through a stop sign. The defendant went onto I-95 and crossed divider line. Once stopped, he was investigated for DUI. He completed the roadside exercises and refused the a breath test. DUI charge dropped.

Case Summary

Date: 09/22/2003
Case #: 20XXCT0XX6XX9AXX NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
The defendant was driving on the highway weaving in and out of traffic. The defendant would change lanes without signaling and speed up in between cars whenever there was an opening. After being stopped for improperly changing lanes the officer found that the defendant’s license was suspended for being a habitual traffic offender. The defendant was eventually charged by the State Attorney’s office for driving on a suspended license as a habitual traffic offender. The State Attorney’s office made a plea offer of 30 days in the Palm Beach County Jail to resolve the case. Our firm filed a motion to suppress arguing that the defendant was stopped illegally and his fourth amendment rights were therefore violated. The State agreed and dismissed the charges.

Case Summary

Date: 08/18/2003
Case #: 03-77XXTCA NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
An office responded to the scene in regard to a reckless driver called in by an anonymous tipster. After DUI investigation, the defendant was arrested and blew .219 and .224. Motion to suppress was granted. DUI charge dropped.

Case Summary

Date: 06/30/2003
Case #: 03-7XXMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
The defendant was stopped for weaving. After roadside exercises were performed the defendant was arrested. He refused breath testing. DUI charge dropped.

Case Summary

Date: 05/28/2003
Case #: 02-100XXMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
A police officer patrolling an apartment complex and saw the defendant sleeping in his vehicle. A DUI investigation begins and the defendant was arrested for DUI. The defendant refuses the breath test. Motion to suppress was granted. DUI charge dropped.
1 … 162 163 164 165 166

CALL FOR
A FREE CONSULTATION

(800)-625-5232

DUI & Criminal Division

Contact Us

(800) 625-5232

Follow Us

Facebook Instagram Twitter Youtube

About Us

Locations: The Ticket Clinic near you

Recent court victories

Abogados de Tráfico y Tickets

Hire us now

Privacy Policy

COPYRIGHT ©2024 THE TICKET CLINIC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Disclaimer: The information contained on this website and any linked resource is intended to provide general information about legal matters to the public and does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. The content is not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up-to-date. NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. The use of the website does not create an attorney-client relationship. The transmission of information via the website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Ticket Clinic, A Law Firm. Nothing presented on the website constitutes legal advice and shall not be relied upon in any way. Until a signed representation and fee agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions here and required payment is received and written confirmation from us, there shall be no attorney-client relationship created. No legal advice is being provided. The website is maintained for informational purposes only. Nothing appearing on this site shall be considered legal advice and is presented only as a general statement of the law. Users of the website should not act, or decline to act, based on information or content from this website. The Ticket Clinic, A Law Firm is not liable for the use, or interpretation, of information contained on the website or otherwise presented on accessed through the website, and expressly disclaims all liability for any actions you take or do not take, based on the website’s content. *For certain non-moving violations, ask for details. “This disclaimer governs your use of our website; by using our website, you accept this disclaimer in full. If you disagree with any part of this disclaimer, do not use our website. We reserve the right to modify these terms at any time. You should therefore check periodically for changes. By using this site after we post any changes, you agree to accept those changes, whether or not you have reviewed them.”

Rolando A. Sanchez, Esq.

Originally from Miami , grew up in Central Florida.  After high school, he joined the U.S. Air Force where he worked on F-15E fighter jets as an Avionics Technician.  He was Honorably Discharged. Afterwards, he attended University of Central Florida and received a BSBA Finance Degree, cum laude.  Next, he attended Barry University for law school and among other things, served as V.P. of the Veterans Legal Society.  Since graduating in 2016, Mr. Sanchez has dedicated his career to helping those charged with criminal matters.  These cases include traffic, misdemeanors and felonies, including trials and post-conviction relief. Mr. Sanchez is the lead attorney in Ticket Clinic’s Kissimmee office, handling cases in Osceola, Polk, Hardee and Desoto Counties.