DUI & Criminal Division
(800) 625-5232

RECENT COURT VICTORIES

To protect our clients privacy, incomplete case numbers are provided.

Case Summary

Date: 03/24/2005
Case #: 04-153XXMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
The defendant was stopped for failing to obey a traffic control device and speeding. After performing roadside exercises poorly on video the defendant was arrested. The defendant took the breath test and tested over the legal limit and registered .143 and .149. DUI charge was dropped.

Case Summary

Date: 03/16/2005
Case #: 05-21024MMAES NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
Arrest report indicated that the client rear ended two elderly women at a stop sign. Client claims that he was not driving at the time of the accident. The elderly women point out the client as the driver. Client has many indications of impairment and performs poorly on the field sobriety exercises. Client also refuses to provide a breath sample maintaining that he was not the driver of the vehicle. State dropped the DUI.

Case Summary

Date: 03/02/2005
Case #: 03-226XXMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
Defendant was stopped for driving recklessly. After completing exercises on video, the defendant refused breath testing. Aquitted of DUI by jury.

Case Summary

Date: 03/01/2005
Case #: 05-0047XXTCA99 NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
Defendant was stopped and investigate for DUI. Defendant submitted to a breath test but refused urine test. DUI charge dropped.

Case Summary

Date: 02/25/2005
Case #: 03-78XXMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
Defendant was stopped for failing to obey police officer and failing to maintain lane of travel. After performing poorly on roadside exercises and refusing breath test the defendant was arrested. DUI charge dropped.

Case Summary

Date: 02/24/2005
Case #: 05-35XXMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
Defendant was stopped and investigated for DUI. After being arrested defendant submitted to breath test but refused urine test. DUI charge dropped.

Case Summary

Date: 01/25/2005
Case #: 04-0104xxMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
The defendant was driving while license was suspended. He was pulled over for failing to maintain a single lane of travel. After being arrested for DUI he refused a breath test. Second DUI offense. Acquitted by jury

Case Summary

Date: 01/24/2005
Case #: 04-365XX-CT NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: Driving While License Suspended
Uncategorized
Dismissed

Case Summary

Date: 01/19/2005
Case #: 03-84XXMM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
The defendant was driving his vehicle without a license and straddling the lines. Once stopped he was investigated for DUI. He was arrested and refused breath testing. DUI charge dropped.

Case Summary

Date: 01/10/2005
Case #: 04-271XX-CT NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: WWRD
Uncategorized
Dismissed

Case Summary

Date: 11/11/2004
Case #: 2014CTXXXXXXXXX No Conviction As Charged
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
Client was stopped for attempting to enter through an exit gate by security personnel. The Client was then asked to do field sobriety exercises once law enforcement arrived. The officers determined he was DUI and arrested him for DUI for the fourth time. Once at the station the Client refused to give a breath sample. The State's initial offer to the client was over half a year in jail. The Firm deposed some of the officers involved and determined that there was an improper arrest of the defendant because no one, other than the private security officers, could place the client behind the wheel. The firm filed a motion to suppress the arrest of the client. The Court agreed and granted the motion, which led to the State agreeing to dismiss all charges.

Case Summary

Date: 10/22/2004
Case #: 08-01XX78XXXM10A NO CONVICTION AS CHARGED
Charge: DUI
Uncategorized
The Defendant was stopped by an Officer from the Seminole Police Department for weaving in and out of traffic and traveling at a high speed as he proceeded toward the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino. Upon making contact with the Defendant, the officer noticed the Defendant to be unable to handle his vehicle documentation; that he had the strong odor of an alcoholic beverage; bloodshot and glassy eyes; and that his speech was slurred and incoherent. When the Defendant exited his vehicle he almost fell to the ground. The Defendant was asked to perform roadside sobriety exercises, but they had to be stopped due to the Defendant’s appearance that he would fall and hurt himself and because he was unable to perform them in a manner to dispel the officer’s belief that he was DUI. The Defendant was then arrested for DUI and refused to submit to the breath test. The firm filed a Motion to Suppress the traffic stop which was granted. The firm was able to prove several inconsistencies within the officer’s testimony concerning what the Defendant did wrong while driving and, ultimately, prove that no traffic violation was committed prior to the stop. The State dropped all charges.
1 … 168 169 170 171 172 173

CALL FOR
A FREE CONSULTATION

(800)-625-5232

DUI & Criminal Division

Contact Us

(800) 625-5232

Follow Us

Facebook Instagram Twitter Youtube

About Us

Locations: The Ticket Clinic near you

Recent court victories

Abogados de Tráfico y Tickets

Hire us now

Privacy Policy

COPYRIGHT ©2025 THE TICKET CLINIC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Disclaimer: The information contained on this website and any linked resource is intended to provide general information about legal matters to the public and does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. The content is not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up-to-date. NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP. The use of the website does not create an attorney-client relationship. The transmission of information via the website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Ticket Clinic, A Law Firm. Nothing presented on the website constitutes legal advice and shall not be relied upon in any way. Until a signed representation and fee agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions here and required payment is received and written confirmation from us, there shall be no attorney-client relationship created. No legal advice is being provided. The website is maintained for informational purposes only. Nothing appearing on this site shall be considered legal advice and is presented only as a general statement of the law. Users of the website should not act, or decline to act, based on information or content from this website. The Ticket Clinic, A Law Firm is not liable for the use, or interpretation, of information contained on the website or otherwise presented on accessed through the website, and expressly disclaims all liability for any actions you take or do not take, based on the website’s content. *For certain non-moving violations, ask for details. “This disclaimer governs your use of our website; by using our website, you accept this disclaimer in full. If you disagree with any part of this disclaimer, do not use our website. We reserve the right to modify these terms at any time. You should therefore check periodically for changes. By using this site after we post any changes, you agree to accept those changes, whether or not you have reviewed them.”

Rolando A. Sanchez, Esq.

Originally from Miami , grew up in Central Florida.  After high school, he joined the U.S. Air Force where he worked on F-15E fighter jets as an Avionics Technician.  He was Honorably Discharged. Afterwards, he attended University of Central Florida and received a BSBA Finance Degree, cum laude.  Next, he attended Barry University for law school and among other things, served as V.P. of the Veterans Legal Society.  Since graduating in 2016, Mr. Sanchez has dedicated his career to helping those charged with criminal matters.  These cases include traffic, misdemeanors and felonies, including trials and post-conviction relief. Mr. Sanchez is the lead attorney in Ticket Clinic’s Kissimmee office, handling cases in Osceola, Polk, Hardee and Desoto Counties.